Time to stop male genital mutilation in the UK?   8 comments

One of the issues raised at The First National Conference for Men and Boys in Brighton & Hove last month was the issue of male circumcision which was highlighted by both NORM UK and Men Do Complain.

According to The Guardian’s “Lay Scientist”, Martin Robbins, “infant male circumcision is genital mutilation” and “men should have the right to choose circumcision, not have the choice forced upon them”.

To read the full article click here now or read an abridge version of Robbins’ article below:

Infant circumcision involves performing surgery without consent to permanently alter an individual’s genitals. In many cases this is done without good medical justification, for example to force the infant to conform to the expectations of a particular religion.

The practice became popular in the United States as a 19th century tool to stop boys masturbating. Female circumcision is ultimately a brutal means of oppressing women’s sexuality, and male circumcision was intended to achieve the same.

Just as we call sex without consent ‘rape’, circumcision without consent or reasonable justification should be called ‘mutilation’.

If you’re still not convinced, try this thought experiment. Imagine waking up tomorrow morning to find yourself tied to your bed and rendered mute, your naked genitals exposed to the harsh glare of hospital lights.

Your parents have decided that some skin should be hacked from your penis; perhaps so you can be forced into their religion, perhaps because they don’t trust you to clean yourself in the shower, or perhaps simply because they think your penis should look more like your father’s.

If you don’t like the thought of this happening to you, if this offends your belief in self-determination or the rights you have over what happens to your body, then how can you justify this practice being inflicted on infants?

Infant circumcision without medical justification should be called what it is – genital mutilation. Deliberately inflicting injury on a baby in order to enforce their conformity with a religion, or to satisfy their parents’ views on what a penis should look like, is a sick act.

It has no place in a modern society. Infant circumcision – regardless of gender – should be stopped.

Posted December 6, 2011 by glenpoole in NEWS

8 responses to Time to stop male genital mutilation in the UK?

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Thanks Glen. I intend to raise this vital issue when the opportunity arises – a great post!

  2. Pingback: How do grow back a foreskin…….. « The Men's Network

  3. Pingback: January national round up of men’s stuff « The Men's Network

  4. Pingback: UK Circumcision campaigners hold BMA vigil « The Men's Network

  5. Reblogged this on krakul19.

  6. Pingback: Transatlantic Start Say Yes To Foreskins, No To Circumcision… « The Men's Network

  7. Pingback: UK Men’s Health leader calls for national debate on male circumcision « The Men's Network

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 34 other followers